





Copy-runnable prompts, tested with expected output. Filter by what you're doing or which tool you're in.
You are an expert B2B copywriter. Write a cold email to {{ceo_name}}, CEO of {{company}}, who is known for {{known_for}}.
Goal: {{goal}}
What I offer: {{offering}}
Why now: {{trigger}}
Constraints:
- Under 90 words
- One specific compliment grounded in something they actually said or did publicly (use {{specific_reference}})
- Single clear ask in the last sentence — no "Would love to chat sometime"
- No corporate filler ("hope this finds you well", "wanted to reach out")
- Tone: warm, sharp, peer-to-peer — never sycophantic
Output the email only. No subject line yet.From the meeting transcript below, extract:
**Decisions** — what was decided. Who decided it. (No verbs like "we should think about".)
**Action items** — concrete tasks. Format: "[Owner] [Action] by [Deadline]". Mark deadline as "TBD" if missing.
**Open questions** — things still unresolved that need follow-up.
**Risks** — anything anyone flagged as a concern.
Skip sections that have no items. Don't summarize the discussion itself.
Transcript:
{{transcript}}Explain the following code to a junior developer who knows the language but not this codebase.
For each significant block:
1. What it does — one short sentence
2. Why it does it that way — the non-obvious reason
3. What would break if it changed
Skip explanations that are obvious from reading. Don't lecture on language basics.
```
{{code}}
```I'm writing a blog post about: {{topic}}
Audience: {{audience}}
Goal: {{goal}}
My angle/POV: {{angle}}
Build an outline with:
- A hook that makes the audience stop scrolling
- 3–5 main sections, each with one specific argument (not a topic)
- One concrete example or story per section
- A conclusion that takes a stand, not "here's a summary"
Avoid: "In conclusion", "It's important to note", three-bullet listicles, balanced "on the other hand" structures unless I asked for a debate.
The outline should be specific enough that someone else could draft from it.Do a competitive analysis of {{primary_company}} vs. {{competitors}} for the {{category}} category.
Pull from: their websites, recent press, G2/Capterra reviews, Reddit/HN discussions, and any earnings reports.
Output a table with rows for each company and columns for:
- Core positioning (one sentence)
- Pricing (entry → enterprise)
- Strongest feature, with one specific user quote
- Most-cited weakness, with one specific user quote
- Last meaningful product update
- Approximate user/customer base if findable
Cite every row. If a row can't be sourced, write "no public data" — don't guess.Read the document below and produce:
**The argument in 3 sentences** — not a description of the document, the actual claim it's making.
**The key evidence** — top 5 facts, numbers, or quotes that support the argument.
**The weakest point** — where the argument is least supported.
**What I'd ask the author** — 3 sharp follow-up questions.
Skip executive summary fluff. No "this document discusses…" preambles.
Document:
{{document}}{{product_description}}, on a {{surface}}, {{lighting}} lighting, {{color_palette}}, shallow depth of field, editorial product photography style, shot on {{camera_lens}}, --ar 16:9 --style raw --v 7Refactor the component below.
Goals (in priority order):
1. {{primary_goal}}
2. {{secondary_goal}}
Constraints:
- Don't change the public API
- Don't add new dependencies
- Keep behavior identical — every prop, every state transition, every effect
- If you find a bug, call it out separately — DO NOT silently fix it
Output:
- The refactored code in one block
- A short bullet list of what changed and why (not what stayed the same)
- A separate "Bugs noticed" section if applicable
```
{{code}}
```Cinematic portrait of {{subject}}, {{expression}}, three-quarter view, low-key Rembrandt lighting from {{light_direction}}, {{wardrobe}}, deep shadows, film grain, shot on Arri Alexa with 50mm anamorphic, dust motes in air, atmospheric, --ar 4:5 --style raw --v 7Camera: slow dolly-in toward {{product}} on {{surface}}.
Subject motion: {{subject_motion}}.
Lighting: {{lighting}}.
Style: cinematic, shallow DOF, anamorphic flares, 24fps, color graded {{color_grade}}.
Duration: 5 seconds.